Intel vs AMD for Second Life

Second Life™ users want performance. Most of you know Second Life is NOT an optimized game world but rather a hobbyists-built world that can drag even the best gaming machine down to single digit frame rates. So, performance is a thing among SL users.

CPUs are the heart of performance with the GPU being the legs.

Both Intel and AMD have new CPUs out. So, the natural question is which is best for running Second Life?

In general, this is how the two stack up in head to head testing. (8+ min)

For some data processing in the beginning AMD is noticeably ahead. Yet in the games similar to Second Life the Intel consistently renders about 5±% more frames.

Another take on the AMD/Intel CPUs is here.

What we find is both CPUs use the same clock speeds, base and at burst speeds. So, theoretically they would be of equal power for SL. However, Intel’s task swapping of threads seems to provide a bit of an advantage.

The Intel i7-8700k 3.7GHz 6 Core 12 Threads (capable of being overclocked) is selling for US$350 at Amazon and B&H Photo. Prices as of 5/28/2018.

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700x 3.7GHz 8 Core 16 Threads (can be overclocked) is selling for $320 at B&H and Amazon.

So, it appears that for $30 more you can get 5% more performance with Intel. Whether are not that will be true for Second Life, we don’t know. Plus, there are so many other factors that affect SL performance we can’t know how any given combination will perform until the unit is tested.

You’ll notice game benchmarks do not include SL performance in their results. To reach gamers Linden Lab should pay them to include the tests as part of the the Lab’s marketing effort. Testers test the popular games. SL doesn’t really fall in that category.

Also, it is hard to get consistent tests in SL. Unless both machines use the same avatar (two accounts using the same starter avatar) and are in the same place looking the exact same direction with the same viewer settings, things are different. SL changes by the second. That makes it hard to come back latter and repeat the tests. Things will change.

My front porch tests are not consistent over time. My cute neighbors have moved out and their nice dance club is gone. I am now staring out my window at another dumb castle. So, my ‘porch’ FPS test results will change… again. Professional testers hate that. They want consistent tests that can be repeated over time. So, I doubt we will see SL in any test results that we don’t do ourselves.

4 thoughts on “Intel vs AMD for Second Life

  1. Intel has an edge in frame rate in Second Life itself. AMD has more cores and more threads at a similar price, but SL can’t take full advantage of all of them so Intel’s edge in single core performance is what matters. Content creators, who are likely to be running other software like Photoshop or Maya at the same time as SL, may have a reason to prefer AMD; the extra cores will provide better multitasking.

  2. I have beendoing multiple tests in Second Life with my system (X5650 Xeon and GTX 780). I have also been searching all the Youtube videos for comparisons between my system and the newer hardware etc. I also have 2 friends who have far superior hardware (8th gen Intel + GTX 1080 ti and the other has an AMD Ryzen 7 1700x + GTX 1070). At one of their SIMS I was getting 325 fps with just 3 avatars on the SIM and only me in view. So my friend sent me a TP to an event she was attending for a Lag Test. 15 fps with 53 avatars. If i limited my view to one avatar I got 30 fps. Removing avatars using the “Rendering Types” tool only got me about 165 fps (slower SL server perhaps?). My friend with the AMD and 1070 was getting the same result as me. Using MSI Afterburner to view each cores performances shows me SL does use more than one core (1-6 over time) but from what I’ve read in a forum and from the results I see all rendering is done on one core (1 thread if using hyper-threading). That thread is typically between 60-100% (is that the bottleneck?) which is when you hit the wall of Lag it seems. So when you check Task-manager and see your cpu is only at 20% that is the avg so not applicable to your performance use in SL. Based on that I suspect you need the fastest single core performance you can get which is the Intels atm however the Ryzens are not on the slow side since they are twice the single core performance as my Xeon and they still have the same performance and lag. My friend with the Ryzen is not happy with the upgrade which might have been unnecessary for Second Life (upgraded from a FX cpu). So if that’s the only reason for an “upgrade” you may find it’s not going to be a benefit. So you need to look at what system and/or price will benefit your overall computer use such as other games, multi-tasking, or video editing etc. In my opinion the newer AMD and Intel cpus are good products. Also You have to look at the cost of the motherboard and Ram upgrade you are also going to need. In the case of AMD some older boards are compatible with the new Ryzen so maybe you save $$$? Anyway it seems that you can’t get better performance on SL with hardware more powerful than mine and a system like mine used is very cheap now with the Xeon being less than $50 and a motherboard in the $150 range and a GTX 780 is about $250 range (however it seems a GTX 1060 would be the better buy for a little more $. I would be very happy if someone could prove me wrong but unfortunately I think that’s the case at the moment. Have you noticed that the Ryzen has a lot less cu usage vs the 8700 and at times even when generating the same fps? Is that good or bad re: Second Life?

  3. I will add that, for now, Intel CPUs are clear leaders when it comes to overclocking… My old 2500K @ 4.6GHz (locked at that clock on all cores) still performs as well or better on a per-core basis than any Zen CPU (which are limited to 4GHz on all cores at best) and just slightly under a Zen+ 2700X…

    Currently, I’d say the fastest CPU for SL would be an overclocked 8600K (the SMT aspect is totally useless and even often degrades per-core performances, so a 8700K is of no use for gaming). A 8600K is easily overclockable to 4.8GHz (some even reach 5GHz) with a good air cooling solution (Noctua or equivalent cooler).

    To upgrade my main system, I will wait for Intel 8-core CPUs or Zen2 (hoping that the latter will be able to at the very least reach 4.6GHz on all cores).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *